My Thoughts on Loose Change 2
I finally saw loose change last night. If you have not seen it yet, go to www.seeloosechange.com. From there you can download it from Google. You will have to download and install some free Googleware but it’s worth it.
The movie covered so much that I’m going to have to see it again to take it all in. However, there are a few things that stand out in my mind. The first thing is the attack on the Pentagon. According to the movie there was no debris that resembled that of what would be found in a conventional airliner wreck – specifically no engines, wings or tail sections. The excuse given by the government for this is it was burnt up by the aircraft’s fuel. This is not possible since the metal used in the aircraft requires a much higher temperature than that of what the aircraft fuel burned at. The other odd thing about the Pentagon attack is that the initial hole made by what hit the building was 16 feet in diameter. If an airliner hit the building the hole would have been much bigger than that. Think for a moment of how big those things are.
The attack on the Word Trade Center towers looks like every commercial demolition I have seen. The Discovery Channel from time to time does shows on commercial demolition of buildings. As I recall, in each the explosions, the buildings look like they are neatly sinking into the ground. There are also small flashes that occur in order from top to bottom of the building as the building goes down. This is exactly what the World Trade Center towers look like. Besides, no other building has been brought down by a fire before. So how could a buildings built as well as the World Trade Center burn for a few minutes and then collapse? Even buildings hit by aircraft before have not collapsed. Case and point, the Empire State building was hit by a military bomber and still stands today.
The movie covered so much that I’m going to have to see it again to take it all in. However, there are a few things that stand out in my mind. The first thing is the attack on the Pentagon. According to the movie there was no debris that resembled that of what would be found in a conventional airliner wreck – specifically no engines, wings or tail sections. The excuse given by the government for this is it was burnt up by the aircraft’s fuel. This is not possible since the metal used in the aircraft requires a much higher temperature than that of what the aircraft fuel burned at. The other odd thing about the Pentagon attack is that the initial hole made by what hit the building was 16 feet in diameter. If an airliner hit the building the hole would have been much bigger than that. Think for a moment of how big those things are.
The attack on the Word Trade Center towers looks like every commercial demolition I have seen. The Discovery Channel from time to time does shows on commercial demolition of buildings. As I recall, in each the explosions, the buildings look like they are neatly sinking into the ground. There are also small flashes that occur in order from top to bottom of the building as the building goes down. This is exactly what the World Trade Center towers look like. Besides, no other building has been brought down by a fire before. So how could a buildings built as well as the World Trade Center burn for a few minutes and then collapse? Even buildings hit by aircraft before have not collapsed. Case and point, the Empire State building was hit by a military bomber and still stands today.
posted by AzLib at 8:49 AM
<< Home